Reconstruction of Richard III - from his skull. |
Richard was a controversial monarch,
regarded as either "Crook back Dick" who caused flowers to wilt when
he breathed on them, or "Good King Richard" - a near saintly figure slandered by history. The problem with Richard's reputation lies in two
things: Tudor propaganda [Richard's reign was brought to an end by defeat at
the Battle of Bosworth, by Henry Tudor] and Richard's link to the murder of the
Princes in the Tower.
Richard III's skeleton in situ. Photo: University of Leicester. |
However, Richard mistrusted the late king's
wife, Elizabeth Woodville, and suspected her family of wanting the throne for
themselves. A wily character, Richard played along and lulled the Woodville's
into a false sense of security. When Anthony Woodville took the young Edward
taken to an Inn , the boy's uncle Richard acted
and arrested Woodville for treason. Anthony Woodville, Lord Rivers was sent
north and then executed without trial.
This treachery gave Richard the excuse to
have the young King Edward V taken to the Tower of London ostensibly because this was where a king prepared for
his coronation, but also for the boy's own protection. Meanwhile, Edward's
younger brother, Richard, remained with his mother, Elizabeth Woodville, who fearful of Richard's motives had sought
sanctuary in Westminster Abbey.
The monument on Tower Green, marking the site of executions, including Lord Hastings. |
Richard needed to have access to the 'spare
heir' and so demanded Elizabeth
release her son/ his nephew, Richard, on the excuse that young Edward needed a
playmate at the Tower. Under likely threat of her own life and that of her
daughter's, Elizabeth
reluctantly released her son. He was taken by boat along the Thames to enter
the Tower at Traitor's Gate and installed with his brother in the Garden Tower
(later renamed, the Bloody
Tower ).
Traitor's Gate. |
In a public relations coup, Richard presents himself as rightful king and on June 25th a parliamentary delegation led by Lord Buckingham petitioned Richard to take the crown. Richard promptly spat on his late-brother's memory and called him a licentious, rapist. On June 26th Richard was made protector and "Edward Bastard, late called Edward V," was dethroned.
Earliest surviving portrait of Richard III |
Richard's coronation took place on July
6th. Only one recorded sighting of the princes after they were reunited on June
16th. "Seen shooting [arrows] and playing in the garden of the Tower
sundry times."
By July 6th the princes had been withdrawn
to the:
"inner
apartments of the Tower proper…and seen more rarely behinds the bars and
windows", and their personal servants were
dismissed.
The last independent witness to see the princes
alive was the royal physician, Dr John Argentine, who was summoned to the Tower
to treat Edward for tooth ache. By all accounts Edward was extremely depressed
and in a lot of pain. [The skull presumed Edward's, found in the 1930's, does
indeed show the bone disease osteomyelitis, affecting the jaw bone.]
Richard went on progress on 20 July and
sometime during September, chronicles by Sir Thomas More have it that two
henchmen entered the boys' chambers and suffocated them with pillows…leaving
Richard unchallenged as King of England.
Richard III |
And finally:
Two centuries later in 1674 during
renovation work at the Tower a buried chest containing the skeletons of two
boys was discovered. In the 1930's forensic tests backed up the suspicion these
were the remains of the missing princes; from their age, to Edward's dental
disease, to the scraps of costly velvet clinging to their bones.
Wow! Thank you for that. It was a fine potted summary!
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed it!
DeleteG x
You realise that Thomas More was still a child (aged 7 or 8) when the Princes were allegedly smothered? And that there was a week between Hastings' arrest and execution? Lots of holes here, sorry. However, I was interested to learn who had last seen the boys alive.
ReplyDeleteYep, no one was saying Thomas More was a witness!!! It was just his version of events, heavily influenced by Tudor propaganda, written decades later.
DeleteHave you read Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey? Excellent arguments in it to suggest Richard III was innocent of the murder of the Princes.
ReplyDeleteDefinately off to look that up. I think this is why the whole 'princes in the Tower' captures the imagination so...no one can say for sure what happened.
DeleteVery interesting. I had not hear of this before. A sad story in a dark time.
ReplyDelete