Why
do we call fine-pottery ‘china’?
Which
tax led to the development of ‘cut-glass’?
This
weekend I had that most uplifting of experiences – finishing a manuscript, The
Ringmaster’s Daughter, and sending it out to beta readers. Whilst awaiting
their verdict I started researching #2 in this series of Georgian romances -
which led me to find out some interesting trivia about dining in the early 18th
century table settings.
Let
us start with George Ravenscroft and his invention of lead crystal (OK, the
purists will argue this is a flawed statement. Apparently George didn’t
‘invent’ lead crystal but refined an already existing process to the point
where it was usable. Also, the word ‘crystal’ is strictly incorrect, since the
structure of the lead-glass is not crystalline
in the scientifically accepted use of the term. But hey ho, it is what
it is and I digress already)
George
Ravenscroft was an importer and exporter
of fine goods who spent some of his career in Italy. Whilst there he observed
Italian glass making techniques and decided it would make good business sense
to recreate their fine crystal for the British market. On his return to
England, he set up a workshop and was very secretive about his methods –
presumably because he was afraid of imitation. It is unclear how he came to
create his fine lead glass (or crystal ) and there were initial teething
problems with crazing or ‘crizzling’ where fine cracks appeared with use,
rendering the glass cloudy with time. But
once the crizzling issue was resolved, Ravenscroft glass became extremely
popular and very fashionable.
The
addition of lead gave the glass a brighter, cleaner appearance which well
suited Georgian tastes. The light scattering properties of Ravenscroft’s lead crystal made it ideal for
chandeliers – and at a time when candles were the main light source for the
wealthy – it was a match made in heaven.
For
the table Ravenscroft manufactured heavy, clear drinking glasses but when a
glass was taxed in 1745, he reduced the weight by cutting deep jags and slices
into the surface of the drinking vessels. This made them sparkle and shine even
more when the light hit them – which became fashionable in its own right.
When
setting a table in the early 18th century, shimmer and shine were
all the rage – and no more so than with eating utensils. The wealthy ate with
silver cutlery – the forks laid prongs down so as not to catch in dangly lace
cuffs and sleeves. Later, in the 1770’s, Thomas Bolsover developed the
technique of silver plating base metals and the way was opened for the
aspirational gentry to adorn their dinner tables with silverware.
An example of a china tea pot - produced in England. Early 18th century. |
The
early 18th century also saw a great fad for china and porcelain. We
derive the generic word ‘china’ from the thin porcelain imported as ballast in
the hold of tea clippers. At this time tea was very expensive and highly
desirable, but the taste was easily tainted in transit by the smell of other
cargo. To this end the tea from China was packed in thin pottery, and in turn
these pots became fashionable. In time, for each ton of tea imported, six tons
of porcelain accompanied it as ballast.
By 1723, over 5,000 teapots for 1 ½ d each, were imported – as compared
to the cost of a (admittedly extensive) tea service in 1712, which was over £5.
In
the 1740’s a Chelsea factory began producing English bone china – beautifully
painted and decorated – the like of which had not been seen before. A passion
for china was born with the wealthy aspiring Meissen crockery from Germany and
collecting tea-cups and ‘jacolite’ (chocolate) bowls from Italy. Indeed, Queen
Anne decreed food must be:
‘…brought to the
table on fair china plates.’
No comments:
Post a Comment
Due to the amount of SPAM I have been forced to moderate comments. If you are a spammer - please go away! You comment will not be posted and you are wasting your own time.
G