In
Victorian Britain, if you couldn't trust your loved ones or the food you eat
not to poison you, then who could you trust? Sadly, the answer did not include
physicians, who frequently employed poison as medicine!
In
the 19th century medicines generally fell into one of two categories: the
useless, and the downright harmful. But far from this seeming a negligent
attitude, doctors worked within the bounds of the knowledge that existed at
that time. Prior to the development of 'germ theory' in the 1880's, physicians
had no understanding of what caused infectious disease (ie bacteria and
viruses) and therefore could not target the root cause (kill the
micro-organism.) Instead treatment relied on bedside observations of the effect
of medications on the progression of symptoms.
Take
this example from the august medical journal, The Lancet (still a leading
publication for the UK
medical professional.)
"An
old woman confined to her chair by rheumatism had a quarrel with her servant
girl…the girl struck back by putting arsenic in the woman's tea…the woman drank
only a little before getting sick…after recovering from the poison she found
her rheumatism was relieved…the accidental arsenic had apparently cured
her."
The Lancet.
The
idea that a poison could have beneficial properties was nothing new, but just a
matter of finding the correct dose.
"Within…
this weak flower, poison hath residence and medicine power"
Romeo and Juliet.
Disease,
it was hypothesised, was the alteration of the balance of humours within the
body; thus any treatment that induced vomiting or diarrhoea, was credited with
purging the ill humour and restoring balance, hence the importance of purges
and laxatives. And perhaps it wont surprise you to read that the most successful
emetics contained poison.
It
was a Staffordshire physician, Thomas Fowler, who in 1786 turned the using
arsenic as medicine, into a science. He published a book of his research (or
rather observations!) titled, "Medical Reports of the Effects of Arsenic",
in which he agreed strongly for the use of arsenic in sick people. One such
case study was a lady suffering from asthma. The patient went from, "Being in a state of constant
breathlessness, incapable of the slight exertion," to near normal
activity. Another asthmatic, who struggled to climb a single flight of steps,
after treatment was able, "To go
from the bottom steps in the Crystal Palace, right off up to the top, without
the slightest embarrassment and much to her own astonishment."
Interestingly,
the medicine used for asthma was often delivered in cigarettes (the smoke
inhaled into the lungs where the effect was desired) and the special tobacco
often had a plant product, stramonium added. Stramonium contains atropine, an
alkaloid which acts on bronchiles to dilate them…and ease breathing.
Fowler
was so convincing, and ever with an eye to safety (!) he had a remedy professionally
approved. It was a mineral solution 'liquor
arsenicalis' with a touch of lavender added to give it a distinctive flavour
and stop people drinking it as water. This solution became known as
'Fowler's Solution.' It became widely used against anaemia, diabetes, heart
palpations, worms, syphilis, tuberculosis, rickets, rabies, menstrual
irregularities and morning sickness!
"In
arsenic we have…a perfect prophylactic in most infectious diseases."
In
the 1840's, arsenic was discovered in the spa waters at Bath , which in the mind set of the day,
offered a possible explanation for the beneficial effect of spa therapy.
And
finally, you may be relieved that not all doctors were convinced that the
benefits of arsenic outweighed the risk of poisoning.
"A large section of the
profession repudiate arsenic altogether…hurling invectives against the temerity
and recklessness of the doctors who prescribe it."
All
this, set against those physicians who insisted that Fowler's solution was
invaluable and would,
"Sacrifice nine-tenths of the Materia
Medicia for arsenic."
If you
were a sick in Victorian times, how hard to know who to believe!
Thank you for the information, Grace. I find the new thinking about disease that occurred in the 19th century to be fascinating. When did the miasma theory end and germ theory begin? How long had doctors and scientists looked at germ theory (germs carried by water)?
ReplyDeleteI'm glad homeopahtic medicine is still in use - so much safer than modern medicine (which has it's place).
ReplyDeleteGini - homeopathy is a whole different debate, as are herbal medicines.
ReplyDeletePeggy, off the top of my head I couldnt tell you the date but I think it was an outbreak of cholera that affected one street, but not the neighbouring one, that provided the first proof for germ theory. The doctor involved worked out the people from houses served by one street stand pipe were getting ill, and when that pipe was shut off, the cases dried up.
G x
That was the 1854 cholera epidemic in London, where the Broad Street Pump in Soho was found to have infected people who drank from it. You can read about it here.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broad_Street_cholera_outbreak
Fantastic! I'm so glad you knew the answer, it was niggling me! The internet at it's best and most efficient - you put a question out there and someone knows the answer!
DeleteG x
Poisons are often prepared homeopathically, which renders them effective but too dilute to be poisonous. Arsenic (arsenicum) is one of the most common. Stramonium is used, too, and strychnine (Nux Vomica). Great stuff!
ReplyDeleteQueen Victoria and family used it- I think Albert brought it with him from Germany where it originated. Queen Elizabeth II and family also use it. I certainly do! But I'm not a queen.
The germ theory also gained a lot of credence in the US Civil War. Battle field surgeons ran out of surgical silk, and resorted to boiling the hair from horsetails to replace it. Those patients sewn up with the sterilized horsetail had better outcomes, and a whole lot of surgeons noticed it.
ReplyDeleteLong time ago, many cases like these existed. It's somehow disturbing to hear such.
ReplyDelete